|
The thing that separates our soccer heroes
from most of the rest of the world is a lack of wimpiness. Oh yeah,
and also that we don't cheat.
This really makes me angry. We
play a very British form of football – lots of kick and chase, hard
tackling, no tricky shit, and an emphasis on fitness. And it's
great. The sound of the wind in your ears as you make an unexpected
break like a charging WW1 digger, the glorious feeling of throwing your
precious body to the ground in front of a stampeding forward in a heroic
slide tackle. That's the game.
But these ‘Latino style players',
as I shall loosely call them, are wimps. They hog the ball, do
silly tricks, and turn their back on you when they have the ball – daring
you to even tap the back of their leg. So what? You ask.
So they're wimps? Well if it were just that, maybe it would be
OK.
But it's the disingenuous cheating
that I really hate. The professional fouling – the pathetic
dives they take every thirty seconds.
We saw it against Holland, the third best
team in the world, where our gritty tackling saw us lose a man for
most of the second half, while they lay about crying on the ground –
and still we got a draw. And they were at home!
 Leg wound: Tim thinks shin pads, like gun control, is for wimps and commies Now it's here that I must declare a
conflict of interest. I play soccer every Sunday in the park. And last weekend – due
to the rainy conditions – lack of numbers meant we had to play with
some of the other groups who converge on the oval for an afternoon kick.
Now these guys epitomised everything
about the ‘Latino' style of play. To start off with, they were
hogs. Second, if you so much as touched their leg they'd writhe
on the ground screaming ‘Why?, Why?' or ‘Hey, Take It Easy'.
Third, they loved to blast shots at goal. They loved it. But do
you think they ever went and got the ball when it went 50 metres past
the sticks? Never, not once. When a player from our team
went to get the ball, they'd quickly get one of their own balls so
we'd play for a few minutes a man down. It was the same with
throw ins. Just hilarious.
So, you'd think if they hated being
tackled, they'd just rock up in sneakers like our team do. But
these guys had the whole lot on, shinpads, boots, soccer jerseys – what a bunch of pretty boys.
You'd think that being such a bunch
of wimps would mean they wouldn't tackle you hard. But no, it
didn't. I received a deliberate super boot to the shin half
way through the match – the guy who did it didn't even look back.
But you see, that's just the idea.
To push you so hard and make you so angry you lose focus. To put
you off your gritty and fit style of game to force you to match their
wanky skills. To punish your sportsmanship and politeness as some
sort of weakness.
Now back to our national team. In bringing
in Guus Hiddink, we've got ourselves an acolyte of the Latino style
of play. During the Japan match he shoved a FIFA official while
he was trying to watch a replay of Japan's cheating goal – later
he shoved a Japanese official when the Japanese were trying to waste
time during a substitution. That's what we've bought in Guus – someone who understands impoliteness, machismo and cheating, and
how to beat it.
So let me just finish by saying – Latin-style soccer, it's just not cricket.
Police Dog Madness
 Tim in the pub with his mate... I was having a Friday night beer at a
Surry Hills pub recently when suddenly in burst four or five uniformed
police and a police dog. They began walking around amongst the
punters – the pigdog's nose twitching and sniffing. Anyway,
it sniffed a friend of mine then sat down. My compadre was then
marched outside and one pathetic, slightly crushed joint fished from
his pocket. Being loaded up on a few Toohey's, I went outside
for a word. And I was met with quite a sight.
There were at least four uniformed police
and two undercover police. Within minutes a van arrived from which
another four or five were disgorged - obviously this was a situation
worthy of backup - if only the Cronulla riots
had been serious enough to warrant such attention.
Anyway I began talking to some of the
un-uniformed plods – who gave me a spirited defence of their actions
based on the amount of property crime and assaults in the area.
I explained this had nothing to do with my friend, but soon after decided
I was wasting my breath.
 ... Just before the cops led him away But three points need to be raised.
First, it is questionable whether these dog searches actually constitute a
legal search – because you can only be searched if a copper has reasonable
grounds to suspect you of something. And what is the search?
The dog's sniffing, or the subsequent request by the cop for you to
empty you pockets, shoes - or underpants? And if the dog's
sniffing is the search, can my friend sue because the dog put
its snout right between his buttocks?
Secondly, surely our money could be better
spent. That one battered joint kept at least ten police occupied
for forty-five minutes. I'd rather that money be put into catching
white-collar criminals who seem to just laugh at the law. Consider the trial of former
One.Tel directors Jodee Rich and Mark Silberman that is still going – it collapsed in 2001.
Thirdly, it might be great for police
PR (and overtime pay) to do a swoop on Oxford St nightclubs and force
everyone to throw their pills on the ground, but does anybody think
it will really stop people taking drugs? Maybe drug use is a fundamental
part of the human condition? Maybe all making them illegal does
is force the people who are going to take them anyway to the black market
where they have no idea what they are taking.
4WD Campaign Working!
You may remember my crusade against 4WD's. My basic thesis was that most people
who drive these enormous petrol guzzling trucks never use them for their
intended purpose so should be punished by having patented Chaser bumper
stickers plastered to them. Well – check out the email we just
got here at Chaser HQ.
Does your organisation approve of your members entering private property to put stickers and abusive letters on peoples vehicles? Whether thesentiments are accurate or not are irrelevant. Your members are free to express their opinions in an appropriate legal fashion. However it is ashame that these members do not have anything more constructive to add toour society than these trashy abusive letters. This type of behaviour only draws negative sentiment to your organisation.
Mandatory BB crosspromotion
Now if you're at all interested in
Big Brother, this week in Who I blog
about boredom and endless idiotic babble being the real enemy in the
BB house, and in my video podcast I break into Nova FM with BB intruder Jade, and
I speak to the renegades from Behind Big Brother - the site the BB
orthodoxy can't shut down!
timbrunero.com
(0) Add a comment |