Friday, July 30, 2010
   
Text Size

Howard tries to split atom, Labor

John Howard's proposed debate on nuclear power has come under fire from the opposition Labor party, which fears it could create toxic political by-products. "There will be no nuclear power under a Beazley Labor government, or in any other hypothetical Labor government," said the Opposition leader in a strongly-worded statement.

"I am, however, in favor of mining uranium, because selling it overseas is the only way to ensure it can never be used here. Nuclear power is unsafe, uncompetitive, and more importantly, it's unpopular. I would only be in favour of it if it is free for all seniors."

Image
caption: Howard tries to create a nuclear fissure in Labor
Peter Garrett attacked the Government, saying that the debate was purely political window dressing, but that it was needed, and that while he was firm in his beliefs, he was considering changing his position to whatever Labor policy was going to be. "When the Prime Minister says we need a debate on nuclear power, he is lying," said the Labor frontbencher, "but don't let that detract from the fact that we urgently need a debate on nuclear power. My view is that nuclear power is something we should consider. It's not? OK - nuclear power is not something we should consider."

While he has not spoken publicly on the issue, Wayne Swan has given careful private consideration to the matter, and after wrestling with his conscience, has come to the conclusion that that the numbers in caucus just aren't there.

Popular frontbencher Julia Gillard's views are reportedly identical to those of Tony Abbott, but result in her being ejected from Parliament.
Banner
World Health Organisation condemns staple diet: "you shouldn't eat staples"